Reviews
Exploring the Smart Case Era: JBL Tour Pro 2 Review

JBL Tour Pro 2 redefines earbud innovation with a touchscreen charging case, offering easy access to settings. , These true wireless earbuds boast sound customization options and advanced features, though some may question the balance between features and cost.
Design
JBL’s Tour Pro 2 earbuds, positioned between traditional and sport models, adopt a design reminiscent of Apple’s AirPods. Featuring a refined look with a blend of matte and gloss black plastic, these earbuds showcase an ovular inner shape, akin to the AirPods Pro. With its ergonomic curves and lightweight build, the Tour Pro 2 ensures a comfortable fit, allowing extended wear without discomfort. The touch panels on both earbuds support various controls, customizable through the JBL Headphones app. However, the standout feature is the’smart case,’ boasting a touchscreen for enhanced functionality. Unlike standard charging cases, this one goes beyond basic charging, offering wireless charging capability and a USB-C port for wired top-ups. The case’s larger size accommodates these additional features without being overly bulky.
Software and Design
The Tour Pro 2 impresses with a plethora of features accessible through the JBL Headphones app and the charging case display. The app guides users through initial setup, including ear tip fit, ANC performance tests, and voice assistant setup. Battery status for each earbud and the case is prominently displayed, with additional features available via scrolling. Ambient Sound Control offers choices like ANC, transparency mode, TalkThru, and off, along with customization options. Personi-Fi, JBL’s personal audio profiles, adjust the sound based on a hearing test and listening preferences. While providing a broader soundstage, some detail may be lost. Sound options include audio presets, manual EQ adjustments, and spatial sound for movies, music, and games. Gesture controls, including VoiceAware, SilentNow, and Personal Sound Amplification, enhance the user experience, allowing customization and scheduling for various modes.
Smart Case
The primary function of the smart case is to provide convenient access to the Tour Pro 2’s features. While the debate about placing controls on the charging accessory instead of the app continues, the touchscreen on the case proves to be effective. Navigating through various options with side-to-side swipes and responsive taps, the case displays battery levels, a clock, and useful icons on the top edge for quick information. During calls, relevant controls also appear on the case. The JBL Headphones app allows customization of the smart case, including adjusting display brightness, selecting screensavers, enabling message notifications, and choosing accessible features on the touchscreen. Default options include ambient sound control, spatial sound, EQ presets, VoiceAware, and auto play/pause. Additional features like SilentNow can be added to the case but are not enabled by default.
Sound Quality and Noise Cancellation
The default sound tuning on the Tour Pro 2 is adequate, offering decent clarity and detail with a focus on the midrange. However, the soundstage may feel compressed despite notable bass and treble elements. Tracks like ’30 Under 13′ and ‘$20’ lose some depth, leaving room for improvement. Although Personi-fi helps open up the sound profile, it comes at the expense of lost detail, affecting the texture of vocals and instruments. The lack of space in the sound profile is evident in recordings like Nickel Creek’s ‘Celebrants,’ where the virtual room’s ambiance is diminished. Despite various audio customization options in the JBL app, improvements are limited, with some settings potentially worsening the sound. Spatial Sound’s effectiveness varies by genre, sometimes offering an immersive experience, but for certain content, it may simply relocate the sound without enhancing it. In many cases, leaving spatial sound off is the preferred option.
Battery
JBL promises up to eight hours of battery life with ANC on and an additional three charges in the case. With ANC off, you could get two extra hours on both the earbuds and per charge in the case. In ‘normal’ use tests, including a mix of ANC, transparency mode, calls, and automatic power-off, seven hours were achieved before docking in the case. However, battery estimates on the case may not be entirely accurate, leading to unexpected drains. The case offers a 15-minute quick-charge tool, providing up to four hours of use. Compared to the Sony WF-1000XM4, considered the best premium true wireless earbuds, the Tour Pro 2 packs numerous features, but the smart case concept is debatable. While offering convenient access to settings, it may not be practical unless left on a desk. Despite features like VoiceAware, SilentNow, and Personal Sound Amplification, the Tour Pro 2 presents as an average set of earbuds with satisfactory sound, decent ANC, and a plethora of features that may not all be regularly used.
In Summary
The JBL Tour Pro 2 is a feature-packed set of true wireless earbuds with a unique selling point being its “smart case” equipped with a touchscreen display. Despite the ambitious inclusion of numerous features like VoiceAware, SilentNow, and Personal Sound Amplification, the earbuds offer average sound quality with a compressed soundstage. The ANC performance is decent, and the battery life falls slightly short of the advertised estimates, with a 15-minute quick-charge option available. The concept of a touchscreen-enabled case is debatable, as its practicality depends on leaving it on a desk for easy access. In comparison to competitors like the Sony WF-1000XM4, the Tour Pro 2 lacks some advanced features and may be considered an average option in the premium true wireless earbud market.
Gadgets Buying Guide
Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs. Vivo X200 Ultra

Design & Build Quality
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: With its sleek 7.9mm thickness and weight of 193g, the Find X8 Ultra strikes a balance between form and function. The aluminum alloy body with Gorilla Glass 7i provides durability while maintaining a premium look. Its IP68 rating ensures it is both dustproof and waterproof up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes.
Vivo X200 Ultra: A slightly bulkier device at 8.0mm and 197g, it features a glass body that is also protected by Gorilla Glass, offering good resistance to scratches and drops. The X200 Ultra shares the IP68 rating, making it equally resistant to dust and water. Both phones use high-end materials, though the Vivo feels a bit more substantial.
Verdict: Both devices offer premium designs, but the Oppo has a slight edge with a more compact form factor and similar build quality.
Display
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: It sports a 6.59-inch AMOLED display with an impressive 1256 x 2760 pixel resolution, offering vibrant colors, deep blacks, and high contrast ratios. The display supports HDR10+ and Dolby Vision, making it great for high-quality video streaming. It also features a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and responsiveness.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo features a slightly larger 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 1260 x 2800 pixels, also supporting HDR10+ but without Dolby Vision. Its 120Hz refresh rate ensures smooth interaction, though the absence of Dolby Vision means it may not offer the same cinematic experience as the Find X8 Ultra.
Verdict: The Oppo Find X8 Ultra edges out slightly in display quality with Dolby Vision support, ideal for media consumption. The Vivo X200 Ultra, while excellent, lacks this feature.
Performance
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 chipset, it offers an octa-core CPU with a 3nm architecture. Coupled with 12GB RAM and UFS 4.0 storage, the Find X8 Ultra provides fast and smooth performance for everyday tasks and intensive applications.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra is equally equipped with the Dimensity 9400 chipset and offers the same RAM and storage configurations. Both phones are highly efficient in handling multitasking and heavy apps. However, Vivo’s optimizations in the OriginOS contribute to smooth performance, with slightly better thermal management reported.
Verdict: Both phones are very similar in performance, offering top-tier processing power. The Vivo may have a slight advantage in thermal efficiency due to its software optimizations.
Software & OS
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Runs on ColorOS 15, which offers a refined, feature-rich interface with customization options. It comes with extensive privacy controls, performance optimizations, and a user-friendly experience.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Utilizes OriginOS 15, which has a similar feature set but with a more pronounced focus on efficiency, streamlined multitasking, and system fluidity. Both OS versions are based on Android 15, providing users with a clean, modern experience.
Verdict: Both operating systems are excellent, with ColorOS offering more customization options, while OriginOS is lauded for its efficiency and smoothness.
RAM Management and Virtual RAM
Effective RAM management ensures smoother multitasking.
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Offers 12GB/16GB of physical RAM with an option for up to 8GB virtual RAM expansion.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Provides similar physical RAM configurations but supports up to 12GB virtual RAM, allowing greater flexibility for resource-intensive applications.
Verdict: Vivo provides slightly more headroom for heavy multitasking with additional virtual RAM.
Camera Systems
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Features a triple-camera setup with a 50MP primary wide-angle lens (f/1.8), a 50MP ultra-wide lens, and a 50MP telephoto lens (f/2.6). It offers superb photo and video quality with features like Dolby Vision support for videos.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra also boasts a triple 50MP camera array, including similar wide, ultra-wide, and telephoto lenses, but with slightly different apertures (f/1.57 for the wide lens). It supports advanced Zeiss optics for superior image processing, particularly in low light.
Verdict: Both cameras are top-tier, with the Vivo offering slightly better low-light performance and optical processing, while Oppo’s Dolby Vision support offers a richer video experience.
Battery Life & Charging
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Comes with a 5630mAh battery, offering decent endurance. It supports 80W SuperVOOC fast charging but lacks wireless charging.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Features a larger 5800mAh battery, providing a bit more longevity. It supports 90W fast charging and 50W wireless charging, plus reverse wireless charging for added convenience.
Verdict: The Vivo X200 Ultra offers better overall battery performance, with faster wired and wireless charging options, as well as reverse charging.
Connectivity
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Supports 5G, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.4, and USB Type-C 3.0, ensuring high-speed connectivity and future-proof networking.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Similarly equipped with 5G, Wi-Fi 6, and Bluetooth 5.4, but with a USB Type-C 3.0 port. Both devices offer the latest in connectivity.
Verdict: Both phones excel in connectivity, offering similar features and future-proof technologies.
Speakers & Audio
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Features stereo speakers with enhanced Dolby Atmos support for an immersive audio experience.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Also equipped with stereo speakers, offering a comparable audio experience, though it lacks Dolby Atmos.
Verdict: Oppo’s Dolby Atmos support gives it a slight edge in sound quality.
Security & Biometrics
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Offers an in-display fingerprint sensor and face unlock for security.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Similarly equipped with an in-display fingerprint sensor and face recognition.
Verdict: Both offer comparable security features, with in-display fingerprint sensors being a standard for both.
Price & Value
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Priced around €550-560, offering a premium experience with Dolby Vision and excellent camera features.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Priced similarly, but with the added benefit of reverse wireless charging and slightly better camera optics, providing excellent value.
Verdict: Both phones provide excellent value at their price points, with the Vivo slightly edging out in battery and camera features.
Final Verdict
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Best for users prioritizing display quality, video features, and overall design.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Best for users who value better battery life, reverse wireless charging, and superior camera performance.
Reviews
Realme GT 7 Pro Specifications

Build and Design
Materials: Aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus front and back
Dimensions: 163.2 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm
Weight: 210 g
IP Rating: IP69 dust and water-resistant
Display
Type: 6.78-inch AMOLED
Resolution: 1.5K (approx. 3040 x 1440 pixels)
Refresh Rate: 120Hz adaptive refresh rate
Peak Brightness: 6000 nits
Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Processor and Software
Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm)
GPU: Adreno 830
OS: Realme UI 6 based on Android 15
Storage and Memory
Configurations:
-256GB with 12GB LPDDR5X RAM
-512GB with 16GB LPDDR5X RAM
Storage Type: UFS 4.1 Pro
Camera System
Rear Cameras:
-Main: 50 MP wide with OIS
-Ultra-Wide: 8 MP
-Telephoto: 50 MP periscope with 3x optical zoom
Front Camera: 32 MP under-display camera
Battery and Charging
Battery Capacity: 6500 mAh silicon-nitride
Charging: 120W wired fast charging
Audio and Connectivity
Audio: Stereo speakers, 3.5mm headphone jack
Connectivity:
-5G, Wi-Fi 7
-Bluetooth 5.4
-USB-C 3.2
-Dual GPS, NFC
Reviews
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Specifications

Build and Design
Materials: Aluminum body
Dimensions: 254 x 165.3 x 6.8 mm
Weight: 515 g
Color Options: Gray, Blue
Display
Type: 11.2-inch LCD
Resolution: 3.2K (3072 x 1920 pixels), 3:2 aspect ratio
Refresh Rate: 144Hz
Brightness: Peak brightness of 800 nits
Processor and Software
Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
OS: Android 15 with Xiaomi’s HyperOS 2.0
Storage and Memory
Configurations:
-8GB RAM with 128GB storage
-12GB RAM with 256GB storage
-16GB RAM with 512GB storage
Camera System
Rear Camera:
-Main: 50 MP primary
-Depth Sensor: 2 MP for bokeh effects
Front Camera: 32 MP
Battery and Charging
Battery Capacity: 8,850 mAh
Charging Speed: 67W wired charging
Audio and Connectivity
Audio: Quad stereo speakers
Connectivity:
-Wi-Fi 7
-Bluetooth 5.4
-USB-C