Connect with us

Reviews

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Review

Published

on

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Review

The trend for folding phones is still on the up and the pioneering company of this technology, Motorola, have released the upgraded Razr 40 Ultra. Their previous model, the Razr 2022, was extremely popular and the Razr brand is now competing with Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip range for the title of best folding phone. It is possible that the Razr may even emerge as the clear victor.

Though the Razr 40 Ultra has some major design upgrades from its predecessor, it ultimately falls short in performance which means Samsung remains the king of flip phones. However, the difference between the two brands has become so close it’s like the gap was shaved by a razor.

The Ultra model boasts an impressive external display that takes up almost the entire front when folded. This display has a range of applications, such as using the cameras, making calls, streaming services and even playing basic games.

Incorporated within this presentation is the two-camera system, which is the same 13MP ultrawide lens from Razr 2022 and a new 12MP main camera. The selfie camera, which is of little use, is also carried over from Razr 2022 and has a 32MP lens situated beneath the internal flexible screen.

The 2022 Razr also retains its Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 processor, 8GB RAM, and 256GB internal storage. An improved 3,800mAh battery is included, which supports 30W fast charging and 5W wireless charging.

 

A look at the design and main features

The Razr 40 Ultra has a few design elements that make it more attractive than the Razr 2022. It measures 171 x 74 x 7mm and is more comfortable to use with one hand. Both the Infinite Black and Glacier Blue models use Gorilla Glass Victus on the rear, which gives them a weight of 189g, while the Viva Magenta, with its soft vegan leather back, weighs 185g.

When you open the phone, the edges of the display are not as pronounced as the previous Razr 2022 model. The hinge crease is as subtle on this version as it was on the Razr 2022, barely showing any dip. In comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 has a visible bump.

The right-hand side has the volume and power buttons located above the hinge, with the power button doubling as a fingerprint reader. The left side is home to the microSD card slot, which can hold cards up to 1TB. On the lower edge is the USB-C port.

The headphone jack is situated next to one of the Dolby Atmos-enabled stereo speakers; the other is placed along the top edge. With an IP52 rating, this phone is more dust-proof than the Galaxy Z Flip 5, though not quite as water-resistant.

Motorola phones always offer excellent software, as it provides a near-stock Android experience without needing to purchase a Pixel. The Razr 40 Ultra is no different. It has simple, straightforward icons and menus, minimal additional apps and a range of customisation options. The phone is shipped with Android 13 pre-installed, and Motorola has confirmed that users can expect three years of software updates and four years of monthly security updates.

At the time of writing, not many apps have been adapted to work properly on the dual-screen setup, however those that have been are very beneficial. For instance, with the camera the viewfinder is completely shifted to the top display and the bottom one is left open for the buttons. Additionally, YouTube allows users to watch videos on the upper screen while simultaneously looking at comments and related content on the bottom.

A Peak at the Display

Gone is the rectangular panel of the Razr 2022, replaced by a full-size display just like the one in the new Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5. The specs on the 3.6in version are far better, with a 1,066 x 1,056 resolution and a quick 144Hz refresh rate. To protect against drops and scratches, a layer of Gorilla Glass Victus sits on top.

The internal display has gone through some modifications. The 6.9in AMOLED monitor now has a resolution of 2,640 x 1,080, which is more than the 2,400 x 1,080 resolution of the Razr 2022, and the refresh rate is incredibly fast at 165Hz. While few apps will take full advantage of the refresh rate, jumping between apps feels amazingly smooth and responsive.

The AMOLED display on the device offers great contrast and black levels, but the peak brightness doesn’t reach the same level as the Razr 2022. With an external light shining on the light sensor, the automatic brightness setting managed to reach 910cd/m², while the Razr 2022 managed to hit over 1,000cd/m².

The Razr 2022’s screen showed more color variation than one would expect given the price, but the Razr 40 Ultra has fixed that. The Saturated mode produces vivid, strong colors ideal for streaming, while Natural provides the most accurate sRGB display. When I tested this setting, it had an sRGB coverage of 93.4% and a total volume of 93.6%, with an average Delta E score of 1.3, which is much decreased compared to what the Razr 2022 displayed.

Performance and Battery Life

The Razr 40 Ultra and Razr 2022 both contain the same 3.19 GHz Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 chipset, resulting in similar performance. If it weren’t for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5, this would be acceptable. The latter phone, featuring the newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, outperformed the Razr 40 Ultra by 12% on single-core tests and 26% on multicore, while costing the same.

The GFXBench Car Chase GPU tests demonstrated a slight decrease in performance, with the Razr 40 Ultra registering 7fps lower than the Razr 2022 on the onscreen benchmark and 14fps lower on the offscreen. Nonetheless, the Razr 40 Ultra still handles graphic-heavy games proficiently, allowing me to play a few levels of Asphalt 9: Legends without any drop in frame rate.

When it comes to hardware, the battery life of the 3,800mAh unit is quite remarkable, as it lasted 21hrs 35mins in our looping video test. This is one of the most impressive performances of a flip phone, with the Galaxy Z Flip 5 surpassing it.

This model includes a faster charging time with the 30W charger; it takes approximately 28 minutes to reach 50% charge and just under an hour to reach a full charge. Additionally, the 5W wireless charging feature is a new inclusion on this model, which may not be as quick, but is still a great addition that brings it closer to the level of Samsung’s output.

Analysis of the Camera

In the same vein as other flip phones, the Razr 40 Ultra has a dual-camera setup at the rear, with a 12MP (f/1.5) wide lens. Although this appears to be a step down from the 50MP camera of the Razr 2022, the amount of megapixels isn’t the only factor to be considered.

The larger aperture on the new Razr 2023 permits more light to enter, thus improving its capability for low-light photography. The Razr 2022 was a bit of a let-down in this aspect, with odd colouring and a lot of noise appearing in the dark; however, the new model’s tones appear more natural even though the sharpness isn’t up to the desired level.

The 13MP (f/2.2) ultrawide lens is a feature that was also included in the Razr 2022 and it still works great. The colour and exposure balance are maintained just as well as with the wide lens, and the finer details turn out quite good, if not spectacular. The macro shots taken with this lens can be considered satisfactory, with well-defined edges around the subject and a pleasing out-of-focus background.

The Razr 2022 and Galaxy Z Flip 5 both offer 1080p and 4K video recording up to 60fps, with slow-motion settings of 120, 240, and 960fps. However, 8K recording is not available on either device, though this should not be a major issue for many users.

 

My Verdict

Had Motorola opted for the more recent Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor, it would have likely been crowned the new ruler of the flip phone world. However, due to the fact that it is offering last year’s performance at the same price as this year, it is a difficult place to be in, especially since the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 offers more advanced hardware for the same amount of money.

Although it may not be the best, the Razr 40 Ultra certainly has its impressive moments. Its updated design is both more stylish and comfortable to use, while the bigger cover display is a great addition. Additionally, the battery life is one of the better ones currently found in flip phones. Despite not having any major leaps in performance, this phone is still the closest any brand has come to replacing Samsung as the top choice for flip phones.

Continue Reading
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Pingback: OnePlus 11 Review - Ibe Gadget Reviews

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gadgets Buying Guide

Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs. Vivo X200 Ultra

Published

on

By

Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs. Vivo X200 Ultra

Design & Build Quality

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: With its sleek 7.9mm thickness and weight of 193g, the Find X8 Ultra strikes a balance between form and function. The aluminum alloy body with Gorilla Glass 7i provides durability while maintaining a premium look. Its IP68 rating ensures it is both dustproof and waterproof up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes.

 

Vivo X200 Ultra: A slightly bulkier device at 8.0mm and 197g, it features a glass body that is also protected by Gorilla Glass, offering good resistance to scratches and drops. The X200 Ultra shares the IP68 rating, making it equally resistant to dust and water. Both phones use high-end materials, though the Vivo feels a bit more substantial.

 

Verdict: Both devices offer premium designs, but the Oppo has a slight edge with a more compact form factor and similar build quality.

 

Display

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: It sports a 6.59-inch AMOLED display with an impressive 1256 x 2760 pixel resolution, offering vibrant colors, deep blacks, and high contrast ratios. The display supports HDR10+ and Dolby Vision, making it great for high-quality video streaming. It also features a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and responsiveness.

 

Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo features a slightly larger 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 1260 x 2800 pixels, also supporting HDR10+ but without Dolby Vision. Its 120Hz refresh rate ensures smooth interaction, though the absence of Dolby Vision means it may not offer the same cinematic experience as the Find X8 Ultra.

 

Verdict: The Oppo Find X8 Ultra edges out slightly in display quality with Dolby Vision support, ideal for media consumption. The Vivo X200 Ultra, while excellent, lacks this feature.

 

Performance

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 chipset, it offers an octa-core CPU with a 3nm architecture. Coupled with 12GB RAM and UFS 4.0 storage, the Find X8 Ultra provides fast and smooth performance for everyday tasks and intensive applications.

 

Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra is equally equipped with the Dimensity 9400 chipset and offers the same RAM and storage configurations. Both phones are highly efficient in handling multitasking and heavy apps. However, Vivo’s optimizations in the OriginOS contribute to smooth performance, with slightly better thermal management reported.

 

Verdict: Both phones are very similar in performance, offering top-tier processing power. The Vivo may have a slight advantage in thermal efficiency due to its software optimizations.

 

Software & OS

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Runs on ColorOS 15, which offers a refined, feature-rich interface with customization options. It comes with extensive privacy controls, performance optimizations, and a user-friendly experience.

 

Vivo X200 Ultra: Utilizes OriginOS 15, which has a similar feature set but with a more pronounced focus on efficiency, streamlined multitasking, and system fluidity. Both OS versions are based on Android 15, providing users with a clean, modern experience.

 

Verdict: Both operating systems are excellent, with ColorOS offering more customization options, while OriginOS is lauded for its efficiency and smoothness.

 

RAM Management and Virtual RAM

Effective RAM management ensures smoother multitasking.

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Offers 12GB/16GB of physical RAM with an option for up to 8GB virtual RAM expansion.

Vivo X200 Ultra: Provides similar physical RAM configurations but supports up to 12GB virtual RAM, allowing greater flexibility for resource-intensive applications.

Verdict: Vivo provides slightly more headroom for heavy multitasking with additional virtual RAM.

Camera Systems

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Features a triple-camera setup with a 50MP primary wide-angle lens (f/1.8), a 50MP ultra-wide lens, and a 50MP telephoto lens (f/2.6). It offers superb photo and video quality with features like Dolby Vision support for videos.

 

Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra also boasts a triple 50MP camera array, including similar wide, ultra-wide, and telephoto lenses, but with slightly different apertures (f/1.57 for the wide lens). It supports advanced Zeiss optics for superior image processing, particularly in low light.

 

Verdict: Both cameras are top-tier, with the Vivo offering slightly better low-light performance and optical processing, while Oppo’s Dolby Vision support offers a richer video experience.

 

Battery Life & Charging

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Comes with a 5630mAh battery, offering decent endurance. It supports 80W SuperVOOC fast charging but lacks wireless charging.

 

Vivo X200 Ultra: Features a larger 5800mAh battery, providing a bit more longevity. It supports 90W fast charging and 50W wireless charging, plus reverse wireless charging for added convenience.

 

Verdict: The Vivo X200 Ultra offers better overall battery performance, with faster wired and wireless charging options, as well as reverse charging.

 

Connectivity

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Supports 5G, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.4, and USB Type-C 3.0, ensuring high-speed connectivity and future-proof networking.

Vivo X200 Ultra: Similarly equipped with 5G, Wi-Fi 6, and Bluetooth 5.4, but with a USB Type-C 3.0 port. Both devices offer the latest in connectivity.

 

Verdict: Both phones excel in connectivity, offering similar features and future-proof technologies.

 

Speakers & Audio

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Features stereo speakers with enhanced Dolby Atmos support for an immersive audio experience.

 

Vivo X200 Ultra: Also equipped with stereo speakers, offering a comparable audio experience, though it lacks Dolby Atmos.

 

Verdict: Oppo’s Dolby Atmos support gives it a slight edge in sound quality.

 

Security & Biometrics

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Offers an in-display fingerprint sensor and face unlock for security.

Vivo X200 Ultra: Similarly equipped with an in-display fingerprint sensor and face recognition.

 

Verdict: Both offer comparable security features, with in-display fingerprint sensors being a standard for both.

 

Price & Value

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Priced around €550-560, offering a premium experience with Dolby Vision and excellent camera features.

 

Vivo X200 Ultra: Priced similarly, but with the added benefit of reverse wireless charging and slightly better camera optics, providing excellent value.

 

Verdict: Both phones provide excellent value at their price points, with the Vivo slightly edging out in battery and camera features.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Final Verdict

Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Best for users prioritizing display quality, video features, and overall design.

 

Vivo X200 Ultra: Best for users who value better battery life, reverse wireless charging, and superior camera performance.

Continue Reading

Reviews

Realme GT 7 Pro Specifications

Published

on

By

Realme GT 7 Pro Specifications

Build and Design

Materials: Aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus front and back

Dimensions: 163.2 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm

Weight: 210 g

IP Rating: IP69 dust and water-resistant

 

 

Display

Type: 6.78-inch AMOLED

Resolution: 1.5K (approx. 3040 x 1440 pixels)

Refresh Rate: 120Hz adaptive refresh rate

Peak Brightness: 6000 nits

Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus

 

Processor and Software

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm)

GPU: Adreno 830

OS: Realme UI 6 based on Android 15

 

 

Storage and Memory

Configurations:

-256GB with 12GB LPDDR5X RAM

-512GB with 16GB LPDDR5X RAM

Storage Type: UFS 4.1 Pro

 

Camera System

Rear Cameras:

-Main: 50 MP wide with OIS

-Ultra-Wide: 8 MP

-Telephoto: 50 MP periscope with 3x optical zoom

 

Front Camera: 32 MP under-display camera

 

 

Battery and Charging

Battery Capacity: 6500 mAh silicon-nitride

Charging: 120W wired fast charging

 

 

Audio and Connectivity

Audio: Stereo speakers, 3.5mm headphone jack

Connectivity:

-5G, Wi-Fi 7

-Bluetooth 5.4

-USB-C 3.2

-Dual GPS, NFC

Continue Reading

Reviews

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Specifications

Published

on

By

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Specifications

Build and Design

Materials: Aluminum body

Dimensions: 254 x 165.3 x 6.8 mm

Weight: 515 g

Color Options: Gray, Blue

 

Display

Type: 11.2-inch LCD

Resolution: 3.2K (3072 x 1920 pixels), 3:2 aspect ratio

Refresh Rate: 144Hz

Brightness: Peak brightness of 800 nits

 

Processor and Software

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3

OS: Android 15 with Xiaomi’s HyperOS 2.0

 

Storage and Memory

Configurations:

-8GB RAM with 128GB storage

-12GB RAM with 256GB storage

-16GB RAM with 512GB storage

 

Camera System

Rear Camera:

-Main: 50 MP primary

-Depth Sensor: 2 MP for bokeh effects

 

Front Camera: 32 MP

 

Battery and Charging

Battery Capacity: 8,850 mAh

Charging Speed: 67W wired charging

 

Audio and Connectivity

Audio: Quad stereo speakers

Connectivity:

-Wi-Fi 7

-Bluetooth 5.4

-USB-C

Continue Reading

Trending