Reviews
Samsung Galaxy A54 Review.

The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a mid-range smartphone that strikes a balance between affordability and impressive features. Boasting a sleek design and a vibrant display, the A54 offers a modern and visually appealing device for users on a budget.
Despite its mid-range cost, the A54 5G does boast some features usually seen on high-end models; however, the old adage still applies: you get what you pay for. Without a doubt, the standout of the Galaxy A54 5G is its fantastic, sizeable screen.
When it comes to mid-range phones, the A54 has everything you need from a large 6.4-inch display to exceptional battery life, a strong construction that can handle water and dust, and a service policy that promises five years of security updates. If you take a closer look at its features, you can almost mistake it for a high-end phone that costs a thousand dollars. Almost.
Construction and Display of the Samsung Galaxy A54
Regarding build quality, the Galaxy A54 has resilient glass on its front and rear, whereas other mid-range phones such as the Google Pixel 6A typically utilize composite plastic. The exterior frame of the A54 is plastic, which might not be as luxurious as the aluminum frames on other models like the S23 or Pixel 6A, and the A54 is chunkier as well. Although not as sleek, the A54 has an IP67 rating, granting it dust resistance and some protection from being submerged in water.
The A54’s screen is certainly something to be impressed by. It offers a larger 6.4-inch OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, compared to the Pixel 6A’s 6.1-inch OLED and its standard 60Hz refresh rate. This faster refresh rate makes the A54 feel more high-end than it is. Scrolling is made simpler thanks to the smooth transition. Furthermore, it can reach 1000 nits in bright outdoor light, making the text on the display more visible even in direct sunlight. This is slightly less than the brightness of the S23 Plus, but it still works well.
The battery and processor of the Samsung Galaxy A54
The A54 has a massive 5,000mAh cell, making it one of the biggest battery capacities you’ll find on any smartphone these days. Its battery stamina is good, though not extraordinary like devices like the Moto G Power. The A54’s power-hungry screen necessitates this large battery in order to keep up. It can charge up to 25W with the right wired charger (sold separately) and unfortunately does not have wireless charging capabilities, which is still not prevalent in the mid-range smartphone class.
I tested the battery by enabling the always-on display and keeping the refresh rate at the highest setting. Even with a full day’s use of data-connected mobile gaming, Google Maps navigation, and browsing the internet, the battery lasted until nightfall with a few single digits left. On a less demanding day, the A54 still had an impressive 50% remaining at the end of the day.
The Galaxy A54 5G sports a huge 5,000mAh battery, however, its performance is only mediocre due to a power-consuming display.
The A54 5G has 128GB of memory, enough to satisfy the majority of users, as well as 6GB of RAM that prevents applications from running in the background and allows efficient multitasking. The Exynos 1380 chipset can handle graphically demanding games such as Genshin Impact, though there may be slight stuttering. For lighter games such as Pocket City 2, the A54 5G is more than adequate.
Samsung Galaxy A54’s Camera
The A54 has an optical stabilisation feature included with its primary camera, enabling the device to take better quality images in low light settings.
My expectations for the Galaxy A54 have been exceeded, although the camera is quite average. It features a 50-megapixel F/1.8 main rear camera with optical stabilization, similar to that of the S23 and S23 Plus. This stabilization helps the camera to capture clearer images in dimmer conditions with longer shutter speeds. The A54 also has a 32-megapixel front camera of moderate quality, a 12-megapixel ultra-wide which is satisfactory, and a largely pointless 5-megapixel macro.
When I tried to use the A54’s camera system in challenging conditions, it did not perform optimally. Compared to the S23 Plus, portrait mode had difficulty keeping focus on the subject in moderate lighting and the subject isolation wasn’t as good.
When not in portrait mode, you can use night mode for dim lighting. However, if your subject is active, it can be difficult to get a sharp photo. The camera has trouble shooting at a speed faster than 1/20th of a second, which isn’t fast enough for living beings. It’s a tough task for most phone cameras to capture a clear image of children or pets in movement, so it’s understandable.
If you prioritise creature comforts, the Galaxy A54 is the best option in this affordability bracket. It offers a large screen with a speedy refresh rate and a rear glass panel. On the other hand, if you value photography above all else I will advise you to seek other options. It is still unmatched in the midrange class as it delivers superior low light performance. Although the S23 Plus is more expensive, it offers better camera processing and a sturdier design, yet the advantages may not be as pronounced as one might expect.
The A54 is a great phone, boasting an impressive screen, dependable performance, and an IP67 rating with strong support. The A54 can still provide a great experience, unless you’re primarily interested in camera quality. It even has a touch of class.
Gadgets Buying Guide
Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs. Vivo X200 Ultra

Design & Build Quality
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: With its sleek 7.9mm thickness and weight of 193g, the Find X8 Ultra strikes a balance between form and function. The aluminum alloy body with Gorilla Glass 7i provides durability while maintaining a premium look. Its IP68 rating ensures it is both dustproof and waterproof up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes.
Vivo X200 Ultra: A slightly bulkier device at 8.0mm and 197g, it features a glass body that is also protected by Gorilla Glass, offering good resistance to scratches and drops. The X200 Ultra shares the IP68 rating, making it equally resistant to dust and water. Both phones use high-end materials, though the Vivo feels a bit more substantial.
Verdict: Both devices offer premium designs, but the Oppo has a slight edge with a more compact form factor and similar build quality.
Display
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: It sports a 6.59-inch AMOLED display with an impressive 1256 x 2760 pixel resolution, offering vibrant colors, deep blacks, and high contrast ratios. The display supports HDR10+ and Dolby Vision, making it great for high-quality video streaming. It also features a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and responsiveness.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo features a slightly larger 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 1260 x 2800 pixels, also supporting HDR10+ but without Dolby Vision. Its 120Hz refresh rate ensures smooth interaction, though the absence of Dolby Vision means it may not offer the same cinematic experience as the Find X8 Ultra.
Verdict: The Oppo Find X8 Ultra edges out slightly in display quality with Dolby Vision support, ideal for media consumption. The Vivo X200 Ultra, while excellent, lacks this feature.
Performance
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 chipset, it offers an octa-core CPU with a 3nm architecture. Coupled with 12GB RAM and UFS 4.0 storage, the Find X8 Ultra provides fast and smooth performance for everyday tasks and intensive applications.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra is equally equipped with the Dimensity 9400 chipset and offers the same RAM and storage configurations. Both phones are highly efficient in handling multitasking and heavy apps. However, Vivo’s optimizations in the OriginOS contribute to smooth performance, with slightly better thermal management reported.
Verdict: Both phones are very similar in performance, offering top-tier processing power. The Vivo may have a slight advantage in thermal efficiency due to its software optimizations.
Software & OS
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Runs on ColorOS 15, which offers a refined, feature-rich interface with customization options. It comes with extensive privacy controls, performance optimizations, and a user-friendly experience.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Utilizes OriginOS 15, which has a similar feature set but with a more pronounced focus on efficiency, streamlined multitasking, and system fluidity. Both OS versions are based on Android 15, providing users with a clean, modern experience.
Verdict: Both operating systems are excellent, with ColorOS offering more customization options, while OriginOS is lauded for its efficiency and smoothness.
RAM Management and Virtual RAM
Effective RAM management ensures smoother multitasking.
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Offers 12GB/16GB of physical RAM with an option for up to 8GB virtual RAM expansion.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Provides similar physical RAM configurations but supports up to 12GB virtual RAM, allowing greater flexibility for resource-intensive applications.
Verdict: Vivo provides slightly more headroom for heavy multitasking with additional virtual RAM.
Camera Systems
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Features a triple-camera setup with a 50MP primary wide-angle lens (f/1.8), a 50MP ultra-wide lens, and a 50MP telephoto lens (f/2.6). It offers superb photo and video quality with features like Dolby Vision support for videos.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra also boasts a triple 50MP camera array, including similar wide, ultra-wide, and telephoto lenses, but with slightly different apertures (f/1.57 for the wide lens). It supports advanced Zeiss optics for superior image processing, particularly in low light.
Verdict: Both cameras are top-tier, with the Vivo offering slightly better low-light performance and optical processing, while Oppo’s Dolby Vision support offers a richer video experience.
Battery Life & Charging
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Comes with a 5630mAh battery, offering decent endurance. It supports 80W SuperVOOC fast charging but lacks wireless charging.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Features a larger 5800mAh battery, providing a bit more longevity. It supports 90W fast charging and 50W wireless charging, plus reverse wireless charging for added convenience.
Verdict: The Vivo X200 Ultra offers better overall battery performance, with faster wired and wireless charging options, as well as reverse charging.
Connectivity
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Supports 5G, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.4, and USB Type-C 3.0, ensuring high-speed connectivity and future-proof networking.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Similarly equipped with 5G, Wi-Fi 6, and Bluetooth 5.4, but with a USB Type-C 3.0 port. Both devices offer the latest in connectivity.
Verdict: Both phones excel in connectivity, offering similar features and future-proof technologies.
Speakers & Audio
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Features stereo speakers with enhanced Dolby Atmos support for an immersive audio experience.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Also equipped with stereo speakers, offering a comparable audio experience, though it lacks Dolby Atmos.
Verdict: Oppo’s Dolby Atmos support gives it a slight edge in sound quality.
Security & Biometrics
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Offers an in-display fingerprint sensor and face unlock for security.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Similarly equipped with an in-display fingerprint sensor and face recognition.
Verdict: Both offer comparable security features, with in-display fingerprint sensors being a standard for both.
Price & Value
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Priced around €550-560, offering a premium experience with Dolby Vision and excellent camera features.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Priced similarly, but with the added benefit of reverse wireless charging and slightly better camera optics, providing excellent value.
Verdict: Both phones provide excellent value at their price points, with the Vivo slightly edging out in battery and camera features.
Final Verdict
Oppo Find X8 Ultra: Best for users prioritizing display quality, video features, and overall design.
Vivo X200 Ultra: Best for users who value better battery life, reverse wireless charging, and superior camera performance.
Reviews
Realme GT 7 Pro Specifications

Build and Design
Materials: Aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus front and back
Dimensions: 163.2 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm
Weight: 210 g
IP Rating: IP69 dust and water-resistant
Display
Type: 6.78-inch AMOLED
Resolution: 1.5K (approx. 3040 x 1440 pixels)
Refresh Rate: 120Hz adaptive refresh rate
Peak Brightness: 6000 nits
Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Processor and Software
Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm)
GPU: Adreno 830
OS: Realme UI 6 based on Android 15
Storage and Memory
Configurations:
-256GB with 12GB LPDDR5X RAM
-512GB with 16GB LPDDR5X RAM
Storage Type: UFS 4.1 Pro
Camera System
Rear Cameras:
-Main: 50 MP wide with OIS
-Ultra-Wide: 8 MP
-Telephoto: 50 MP periscope with 3x optical zoom
Front Camera: 32 MP under-display camera
Battery and Charging
Battery Capacity: 6500 mAh silicon-nitride
Charging: 120W wired fast charging
Audio and Connectivity
Audio: Stereo speakers, 3.5mm headphone jack
Connectivity:
-5G, Wi-Fi 7
-Bluetooth 5.4
-USB-C 3.2
-Dual GPS, NFC
Reviews
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Specifications

Build and Design
Materials: Aluminum body
Dimensions: 254 x 165.3 x 6.8 mm
Weight: 515 g
Color Options: Gray, Blue
Display
Type: 11.2-inch LCD
Resolution: 3.2K (3072 x 1920 pixels), 3:2 aspect ratio
Refresh Rate: 144Hz
Brightness: Peak brightness of 800 nits
Processor and Software
Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
OS: Android 15 with Xiaomi’s HyperOS 2.0
Storage and Memory
Configurations:
-8GB RAM with 128GB storage
-12GB RAM with 256GB storage
-16GB RAM with 512GB storage
Camera System
Rear Camera:
-Main: 50 MP primary
-Depth Sensor: 2 MP for bokeh effects
Front Camera: 32 MP
Battery and Charging
Battery Capacity: 8,850 mAh
Charging Speed: 67W wired charging
Audio and Connectivity
Audio: Quad stereo speakers
Connectivity:
-Wi-Fi 7
-Bluetooth 5.4
-USB-C