In terms of delivering powerful performance in a small space, Asus remains the leader in the smartphone market. Additionally, Asus phones tend to have great battery life, though their camera capabilities and software updates are not as advanced as those of Samsung and Google.
In conclusion, after having read this review of the Asus Zenfone 10, we can state with confidence that it would be a great buy for any Android user, regardless of whether they are looking for a smaller phone or not.
The Design of the Asus Zenfone 10
For the past few generations of Zenfone, Asus has put an emphasis on making their devices compact. This has not changed; the phone is still a 5.9-inch handset that is more diminutive than most other Android phones that can be purchased presently.
The Zenfone 10 can be distinguished from its predecessor by its rear cameras encircled by new rings and its distinct back panel texture; otherwise, it is quite difficult to tell the two Zenfones apart.
Weighing in at 6.02 ounces (172g), the Zenfone 10 is slightly heavier than its predecessor, but still quite lightweight. Its slender size allows for Asus to ensure that the phone can be comfortably used with one hand, making it a great option for those who want a smaller device.
The pleasure and productivity of being able to operate the Zenfone 10 with one hand while my other hand is occupied, like when I’m having a cup of coffee.
The Zenfone 10’s lightweight design is partially due to its bio-polycarbonate plastic back. Although the thought of plastic on a high-end phone may be a cause for concern for some, it does not feel in any way inexpensive. In fact, the material offers a unique, grippy texture that provides a reassuring feeling when held.
The Zenfone phone includes a 3.5mm headphone jack along the top edge, a feature that is becoming increasingly rare on devices. To top it off, the phone also offers IP68 dust/water resistance, something many other flagship phones seem to lack. It makes one wonder why Asus can manage to provide both features.
For the Zenfone 10, Asus has presented a broad range of colours including Aurora Green, Midnight Black (shown), Comet White, Starry Blue, and Eclipse Red.
Assessing the Display of the Asus Zenfone 10
The Zenfone 10 is equipped with a 5.9-inch AMOLED display with FHD resolution and a maximum refresh rate of 144Hz which only works in certain games. For other uses, it still offers a smooth 120Hz performance which is on par with Samsung’s S23 flagships and better than the 90Hz peak of the Pixel 7.
It’s a pity that the Zenfone does not quite measure up to the Galaxy S23 and Pixel 7 when it comes to luminosity and colours. Despite its large-screen advantage, the Zenfone 10’s accuracy of colours and peak brightness are lower than those of the other two phones. Nevertheless, the Asus phone still provides a respectable colour gamut coverage.
Analysis of the Camera Feature on the Asus Zenfone 10
In terms of its camera setup, the Zenfone 10 may not be the most impressive. However, its 50MP main camera, 13MP ultrawide camera, and 32MP selfie camera are of good quality. The Galaxy S23 contains a telephoto camera, while Google’s Pixel 7 has some of the best photo processing technology on any phone. It’s in other areas where the Zenfone 10 can be seen to have value, rather than its photo kit.
The 50MP main camera on the Zenfone 10 doesn’t include a zoom lens, however it does permit up to 8x digital zoom with a pre-set 2x in the camera interface, which will deliver the same 12MP resolution as a normal 1x shot. This 2x zoom can be compared to what the S23 offers, as their main camera is also used for this magnification, whereas the dedicated telephoto camera starts at 3x.
The pictures taken by both devices are particularly noteworthy, although some may find the brighter and clearer photograph taken by the Galaxy S23 to be superior to the dimmer and softer photograph taken by the Zenfone.
When comparing the video capture capabilities of the Zenfone 10 to the S23, the difference is clear. The main camera of the former is equipped with a 6-axis hybrid gimbal system that stabilizes the phone up to 1.5 degrees in any direction, making the bobbing effect while walking much smoother. The results of this system are evident when panning motions are recorded.
The resolution of the selfie camera on the Zenfone has been modified by Asus, who have replaced the traditional RGGB sensor with one featuring RGBW pixels. This is believed to improve lighting and reduce noise.
In any case, the Zenfone 10 produced a darker self-portrait than the S23. Furthermore, the portrait mode effect of the Zenfone has not been able to cut me out as well. The Zenfone’s colours are more vivid, which make the bright areas of a photo stand out more and not cast a pallor over me as the S23 does.
At the end of the day, the Zenfone is able to go head-to-head with the Galaxy S23, even if it isn’t able to surpass it in any particular category. Unfortunately, it lacks a telephoto camera which is a shame, as Asus had to likely opt for cost-effectiveness or to save internal space. For the price one would pay for this phone, it would be nice to have a third rear camera to cover all essential phone photography requirements.
Asus has certainly not been stingy with the Zenfone 10 when it comes to the chipset. It is powered by a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, and you can choose between 8GB, 12GB, and 16GB of RAM depending on where you purchase it and the amount of money you are willing to spend. Therefore, you are getting similar performance to the Galaxy S23’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, or even more memory than what is available on the much pricier Galaxy S23 Ultra.
The investment Asus put into the RAM and processor of the Zenfone certainly showed in our benchmark tests. It was able to either beat the Galaxy S23 or come close to it, despite the latter having much less RAM but possessing a top of the line Snapdragon chip. The Pixel 7, on the other hand, with its Google Tensor G2, was not able to compete in these tests, even though it offers other advantages that the tests were unable to measure.
The storage capacity on the Zenfone 10 ranges from 128GB to a whopping 512GB, so you’re sure to have enough space for all your files regardless of how much you use your device.
The Battery and Charging capabilities
The battery capacity of the Zenfone 10 is quite impressive, given its compact size, at 4,300 mAh. This is more than the 3,900 mAh offered in the Galaxy S23 and almost matches the 4,355 mAh in the Pixel 7. What is remarkable is that despite its smaller size, the Zenfone still manages to offer a greater amount of battery power than the other two devices.
Recharging doesn’t take place rapidly, unfortunately, as the most it can do is 30W. This is especially slow when compared to a device such as the OnePlus 11, which has an 80W charging speed. After 30 minutes plugged in, a depleted Zenfone 10 only reaches 54% battery life, which is not particularly speedy in today’s standards.
Fortunately for Asus, the Galaxy S23 charges rather quickly, achieving 55% in a 30-minute period. Additionally, the Zenfone 10 surpasses the S23 and Pixel 7 by including a charger in its package.
The charging rate of 30W remains the same as the Zenfone 9, but the Zenfone 10 has added 15W wireless charging. We weren’t able to test it, but according to Asus it should take two hours to charge the device wirelessly. Even though it’s a lengthy process, it’s still convenient to have as an option to charge your phone without looking for a cable.
The Software and Unique Elements on the Asus Zenfone 10
At initial inspection, the surface of the Zenfone 10 appears like the run-of-the-mill Android, but Asus has implemented a few one-of-a-kind touches. The power menu, volume controls, lock screen and quick settings all have an alternate aesthetic, and are structured to give more options with fewer taps than traditional Android, something I definitely appreciate.
Using ZenTouch, further shortcuts come in handy when you swipe on the fingerprint-reading power button. My favoured ZenTouch shortcut is to open and close the notifications shade/quick settings window, yet one could also use this feature to scroll through webpages or skip through YouTube videos.
The Zenfone 10 has a useful QuickShot feature that activates the camera with a double-press of the power button and takes a series of pictures in a row. Furthermore, the Edge Tool provides a fast way to access apps and shortcuts with a swipe from the side of the screen, though it is not as customizable as Samsung’s Edge Panels.
The future holds more from Asus. An upgrade to the Zenfone 10 will bring a semantic photo search feature, similar to those on iPhones and certain Android devices, that will make it simpler to look for pictures of specific topics or containing certain words in the gallery.
Despite the numerous impressive features of the Asus product, its update schedule is a major letdown. It only offers two years of full Android software updates and four years of security updates, as opposed to Samsung and Google, who both offer four and three years of full updates, respectively.
The size of the current market for sub-6-inch phones is uncertain, however, the Asus Zenfone 10 appears to have created a stronghold in this area.
Finding something similar to the Zenfone in terms of size and quality is hard. If you’re looking for a smaller Android phone, the 6.1-inch Google Pixel 7a or the basic Samsung Galaxy S23 might be a good option. However, the Galaxy Z Flip 4 could be a more suitable choice since it can be closed up to reach a smaller size. But when it comes to cost, power and power efficiency, the Zenfone is the best alternative among these phones, unless you prioritize photo quality above all else.
Apple Watch Series 9 Vs. Ultra 2
Despite their distinct external appearances, the Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 share significant similarities internally. Priced at $399, the Series 9 and the more robust Ultra 2 at $799 both utilize the S9 chip, providing features such as Double Tap, on-device Siri, and fast performance. However, the Ultra 2, with its larger 49mm size, titanium case, and included LTE connectivity, distinguishes itself with a higher price point.
The $399 Series 9 adds complexity to the decision-making process. Initially, you must choose between a 41mm or 45mm size, followed by selecting an aluminum or stainless steel case and deciding on the inclusion of LTE. Notably, the 45mm Series 9 in stainless steel is priced at $749, placing it in direct competition with the Ultra 2.
The pricing aspect may not be as straightforward as initially perceived.
Differences in Screen Size
The Apple Watch Ultra 2 boasts a larger and brighter screen compared to the Series 9. Despite the Ultra 2’s 49mm case being bigger than the 45mm Series 9, the screen itself is slightly larger, allowing for more content display particularly useful for applications such as Maps.
To easily observe the size distinction, one can maximize the text size on both watches. This becomes evident as part of the text is truncated on the Series 9 in contrast to the Ultra 2.
The most significant contrast in day-to-day use lies in screen brightness. The Ultra 2 surpasses the Series 9 with a brightness of 3,000 nits compared to 2,000. While the Series 9 remains visible both indoors and outdoors, the extra brightness on the Ultra 2 enhances readability, particularly during workouts in bright sunlight.
This heightened brightness also proves advantageous for the flashlight feature. By turning the digital crown on the Ultra 2, you can maximize the screen brightness when using the flashlight, which proves helpful in dark situations.
The Apple Watch Series 9 could be a preferable choice for those with smaller wrists. The Ultra 2, being a sizable watch with a bulkier digital crown and a flat display, notably stands out more than the Series 9.
The Ultra 2’s larger size may pose challenges for those with even smaller wrists than mine(150 mm). Opting for the Series 9 could be a preference in such cases, offering a choice of a smaller case size. Additionally, I observed that the Series 9 provides greater comfort for sleep tracking.
Despite its larger size, the Ultra 2 is designed to be a more rugged watch than the Series 9. Its titanium case, slightly elevated for added protection, enhances durability for the sapphire crystal display. The Series 9 display, on the other hand, comes with Ion-X glass for the aluminum case and sapphire crystal for the stainless steel case.
Both watches are IP6X dust-resistant and water-resistant, but the Ultra 2 excels with a depth rating of 100m compared to Series 9’s 50m. Moreover, it features an exclusive Depth app and supports the Oceanic Plus app, transforming the watch into a dive computer.
Double-Tap Gesture and Siri
Both the Apple Watch Ultra 2 and Series 9 feature the Double Tap gesture and on-device Siri functionality. This gesture, powered by the common S9 chip, operates identically on both watches. When the screen is active, a double tap with your thumb and forefinger allows you to perform tasks without touching the screen. For instance, raising your wrist and double tapping enables you to reply to a message using dictation, followed by another double tap to send.
This feature proves helpful, precise, and functions seamlessly in various Apple applications. It facilitates actions such as answering calls, changing tracks, and managing timers. In third-party apps, it generally executes the default action upon double tap. Personally, I use it to swiftly respond to Slack messages from colleagues when unable to reach my phone or type a response on my computer.
The consistency in functionality arises from both watches running the same chip. On-device Siri is also consistent, eliminating the need to ping the cloud for tasks like starting a workout or setting a timer. Additionally, both watches boast 64GB of internal storage, ideal for storing music or numerous apps on your watch.
The Apple Watch Ultra 2 offers exclusive features, enhancing the shared WatchOS 10 experience and app selection on both watches. Unique watch faces, like Modular Ultra and Wayfinder, provide detailed information and a dark mode that turns either watch face red when the light sensor detects it’s dark outside. The Ultra 2 excels in communication with a three-microphone array and louder dual speakers than the Series 9, as demonstrated in a recorded call audio comparison. Notably, Ultra 2 comes with LTE as standard, allowing standalone use without the phone, while the Series 9 requires a specific LTE version. Both watches feature the second-gen ultrawideband chip for precise iPhone finding and phone pinging from the watch for older iPhone models.
The Ultra 2 distinguishes itself with a notable design feature absent in the Series 9—the Action button. Similar to the Action button on the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max, it allows you to swiftly launch favorite workouts, the flashlight, stopwatch, and other preset tasks.
An intriguing use of the Action button is to initiate a Shortcut, providing a quick access route to favorite features or tasks within an app. Creating a Shortcut is possible using the dedicated app on the iPhone.
While the Series 9 doesn’t have the dedicated Action button, it still supports Shortcuts. You can set a complication on the watch face to launch a Shortcut, but it requires an extra tap on the screen to confirm your intent.
Health Tracking Features
The health tracking features of the Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 are remarkably similar. Both include a temperature sensor, blood oxygen sensor, ECG app, and alerts for high and low heart rates, as well as irregular heart rhythms. The heart rate sensor, accurate when compared to a chest strap, is identical on both watches.
Fitness tracking is uniform, with progress monitored through the Apple Watch Activity app. Both watches support Bluetooth accessories, such as power meter pedals, allow the creation of multisport workouts, and provide heart rate zone monitoring.
Standard features on both watches include a compass app, back track, waypoint functionality, car-crash detection, fall detection, and emergency SOS.
Notable differences include the Ultra 2’s 86dB siren for safety and dual-band GPS, utilizing both L1 and L5 bands for increased accuracy in tracking distance and route information, especially in built-up areas. However, the Series 9 still performs admirably for regular outdoor activities like runs in the park or bike rides on trails.
The Apple Watch Ultra 2 stands out with exceptional battery life, surpassing the Series 9 in every usage scenario. Regardless of whether you’re running a marathon or simply using it for timekeeping and notifications, the Ultra 2 outperforms the Series 9.
Officially rated at 36 hours, the Ultra 2’s battery life exceeds Apple’s conservative estimate. In regular use, which includes phone notifications, an always-on display, GPS workouts, and sleep tracking, the Series 9 lasts about a day and a half before needing a charge. In comparison, the Ultra 2 can last closer to three full days with the same usage.
Both watches offer a low power mode to further extend battery life, but actual results may vary based on usage, with resource-intensive tasks like LTE and Bluetooth music streaming affecting battery depletion. Fast wireless charging is supported by both, requiring an 18-watt or higher adapter. The Series 9 charges faster due to its smaller battery capacity.
When comparing the Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2, which share a similar feature set including Double Tap and on-device Siri, the key distinctions lie in size, price, and battery life. The Series 9, being more affordable and slimmer with two size options, requires more frequent charging. Both are excellent choices for an iPhone-compatible smartwatch, but after a month of use, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 stands out as my preferred option. Its extended battery life eliminates daily charging concerns, and the customizable Action button enhances usability, making it more enjoyable and convenient.
Apple Vision Pro Review
The new Apple Vision Pro, Apple’s highly anticipated foray into wearable computers, faces significant expectations. Priced at $3,499, it introduces “spatial computing,” aiming to seamlessly integrate apps into your surroundings. Apple’s bold advertisements depict people wearing the Vision Pro in various daily scenarios, emphasizing the ambitious goal of augmenting reality by layering apps and information over the real world.
- Impressive display, a technical marvel, offering the best video passthrough to date.
- Noteworthy advancements in hand and eye tracking technology.
- Seamless integration with Apple’s ecosystem.
- Enjoyable experience placing windows throughout space.
- Come with a hefty price tag.
- Video passthrough may still be blurry.
- Inconsistent and occasionally frustrating hand and eye tracking.
- Personas can be uncanny and somewhat unsettling.
- Can feel isolated or lonely during use.
Apple’s Vision Pro marks the tech giant’s inaugural venture into constructing a computer that seamlessly integrates into your surroundings. The aim is to position the Vision Pro as a comprehensive device, coexisting with Macs and iPads in Apple’s ecosystem, enabling users to accomplish meaningful tasks. From handling productivity tools like Excel, Webex, and Slack to leisure activities such as watching movies on a virtual 4K HDR display, the Vision Pro offers a versatile experience. Additionally, users can mirror their Mac’s display, utilizing the Vision Pro as a vast monitor suspended in virtual space.
While the Vision Pro boasts impressive features, it comes with significant tradeoffs that cannot be overlooked. Tangibly, the headset’s tech contributes to considerable weight on the face, leading Apple to opt for an external battery pack connected by a cable. Beyond physical aspects, there are also philosophical tradeoffs inherent in the design and functionality of the device.
Apple positions the Vision Pro as more than just a VR headset, blending virtual and real-world experiences. Its compact design, crafted from magnesium, carbon fiber, and aluminum, defies expectations of bulkier VR headsets. The front EyeSight display attempts real-world connection but falls short with a low-res OLED.
Under the cover glass, the Vision Pro boasts an array of cameras and sensors for video passthrough, hand tracking, and spatial awareness. Powered by an M2 processor, it incorporates a unique R1 spatial coprocessor and includes detachable headbands, magnetic light seals, and adjustable headbands.
The speakers deliver impressive spatial audio but tend to be leaky, prompting the need for headphones. Weighing between 600 and 650 grams, the Vision Pro’s front-loaded distribution may impact comfort during extended use. The external battery, while contributing to weight management, limits runtime to around two and a half hours.
Setup is simplified, utilizing motorized adjustments and familiar iOS processes. Despite its design excellence, the Vision Pro’s weight becomes noticeable during prolonged use, emphasizing the trade-off for its sleek appearance.
Apple showcases the Vision Pro’s displays as a remarkable technological leap, featuring MicroOLEDs with 23 million pixels at just 7.5 micrometers. Despite their excellence, the high cost and inherent tradeoffs highlight the challenges of implementing them in this device.
The headset prioritizes real-time video passthrough, blurring the line between VR and AR. Apple’s claimed 12ms latency and adept video processing deliver an impressive experience, even in challenging situations like working in front of a large window.
However, Apple acknowledges display effects, with spokesperson Jacqueline Roy detailing hardware and software efforts to minimize these issues. While the Vision Pro’s video passthrough is the most advanced in consumer devices, occasional quirks persist, challenging the perception of flawless visuals given the high price tag.
In essence, the Vision Pro’s display, while exceptional, serves as a reminder that screens can’t fully replicate the richness of reality, falling short in capturing the vibrant colors and intricacies found in the world around us.
Apple takes pride in the Vision Pro’s cutting-edge eye and hand tracking control system, surpassing other consumer systems. Operating as if your eyes are the mouse and your fingers are the button, you navigate the interface by looking at and tapping on desired elements.
Initially, using hand and eye tracking feels like a superpower, with external cameras effortlessly capturing hand movements within a generous zone. However, the novelty fades as the requirement to constantly look at what you want to control becomes distracting and, in some cases, hinders usability. Unlike traditional computers where input is independent of your gaze, the Vision Pro demands your attention, leading to moments of frustration, especially in activities that require sustained focus.
The Apple Vision Pro, priced at $3,499, marks Apple’s venture into “spatial computing,” aiming to integrate augmented reality into daily life. While the display impresses with stellar video passthrough and remarkable MicroOLED technology, weighing between 600 and 650 grams, it poses ergonomic challenges, and its external battery pack adds to the bulk. The headset’s visuals, despite advancements, suffer from common VR limitations such as motion blur and color gamut restrictions.
Controlled by a sophisticated eye and hand tracking system, the Vision Pro offers a unique interface, but the constant need to look at what you want to control becomes distracting, deviating from the independent input mechanisms of traditional computers. The eye tracking, while awe-inspiring initially, exhibits inconsistencies over time, hindering the overall user experience.
In essence, the Vision Pro presents an impressive step towards spatial computing but grapples with weight, display limitations, and occasional control challenges, prompting users to weigh the magic it offers against notable tradeoffs.
Complaining about a hand tracking system needing to see hands might seem silly, yet the Vision Pro’s limitations become evident. While Siri and dictation help navigate visionOS, the constant awareness of hands and the visual tracking system’s occasional failures make it a unique, sometimes frustrating, experience. The system, keen on capturing hand movements, can lead to amusing unintended inputs, showcasing both the system’s brilliance and its pitfalls. Achieving rock-solid reliability in the input system is crucial for a seamless computing experience in the Vision Pro.
Shooting photos with the Vision Pro yields low-quality 6.5-megapixel stills, and videos, though slightly better, suffer from noticeable compression and barrel distortion when viewed on non-Vision Pro devices. The impracticality of taking photos with the headset and the assumption that most users own iPhones with superior video capabilities make these features seem less significant. However, spatial videos shot on the iPhone 15 Pro Max and viewed in 3D on the Vision Pro offer a compelling, albeit solitary, experience, allowing users to relive memories in a bittersweet fashion.
The Vision Pro operates on visionOS, a customized version of iPadOS with optimizations for spatial computing. Leveraging iPadOS provides Apple with a robust app library from the start, although early controversies involve major developers like Netflix, Spotify, and YouTube holding off on supporting the Vision Pro. While Safari on the device accommodates web-based experiences, WebXR support is inconsistent. Apple expresses commitment to contributing to WebXR but acknowledges the current variability. Notably, YouTube VR lacks support, with Apple citing a focus on delivering high-quality spatial media experiences. The Vision Pro’s app ecosystem and web compatibility remain evolving aspects.
VisionOS sets itself apart with a novel experience featuring free-floating windows for unlimited app openings and spatial arrangement. The multi-operating system support adds versatility, integrating native visionOS apps, iPad apps, and Mac connectivity. However, the personal nature of the spatial environment limits shared experiences. The intuitive gestures for window management lack centralized controls, making it more complex than typical iOS devices. Seamless Mac display sharing showcases the Vision Pro’s versatility, transforming it into a virtual Mac display.
While Vision Pro falls short in true AR interaction, subtle features like the “connect display” button and a text preview window during Bluetooth keyboard use offer a glimpse into AR possibilities. In mixed reality scenarios, particularly in entertainment, Vision Pro excels. Immersive movie experiences, 3D content, and Apple’s library of 3D movies enhance the viewing experience. Yet, the device’s weight and DRM limitations pose challenges during screen captures.
Gaming on the Vision Pro lacks popular VR titles and fitness apps, highlighting a gap compared to competitors like Quest. Concerns about the device’s weight and design arise, impacting its suitability for physical gaming experiences. While developers work on porting more games, the absence of established titles like Beat Saber points to a current limitation. A cautionary note emphasizes the need for users to adapt gradually to VR motion, acknowledging potential motion sickness.
Despite its impressive features, the Vision Pro’s hefty price and specific limitations raise questions about its broader market appeal, especially compared to dedicated VR platforms. While its transformation into a virtual Mac display showcases versatility, considerations about weight, gaming ecosystem, and adapting to VR motion suggest a niche audience for this mixed reality device.
The Vision Pro is a testament to Apple’s engineering prowess, showcasing a stunning display, sophisticated passthrough technology, and seamless integration within the ecosystem. However, it may unintentionally reveal that certain core ideas, like camera-based mixed reality passthrough or advanced hand- and eye-tracking, could be dead ends, facing challenges for mainstream adoption. Despite its magical moments, the device’s complex technology might be ahead of its time.
Alternatively, the Vision Pro could serve as a precursor to Apple’s envisioned true AR glasses, acting as a simulator or developer kit. This perspective suggests the current device is a stepping stone for app and use case development, preparing the ground for future optical AR glasses capable of shared digital experiences. However, these scenarios come with significant tradeoffs, emphasizing the inherent loneliness of the Vision Pro experience. Tim Cook’s acknowledgment of headsets being isolating rings true, posing challenges for a device aiming to be a primary computing tool. Despite its impressive features, the Vision Pro raises questions about its role in collaborative workspaces and everyday computing.
Things to Know about the AI-Powered Samsung Galaxy S24 Series
Explore a realm of endless possibilities with the newly launched Galaxy S24 Ultra, Galaxy S24+, and Galaxy S24, now available for purchase. Empowered by Galaxy AI1, these devices redefine our phone interactions, offering innovative ways to create, connect, and beyond. Starting the journey, the Samsung Care team highlights seven key features that make the AI-powered Samsung Galaxy S24 Series a game-changer.
Here are standout things you need to know about the AI-powered Samsung Galaxy S24 Series.
1. Enhance your S24 performance with the enhanced Galaxy AI experience.
The Galaxy S24 series is infused with artificial intelligence (AI), enriching every aspect of your smartphone experience. Packed with AI capabilities, your S24 is geared to elevate your Galaxy experience and boost productivity. With Galaxy AI, you can seamlessly keep pace with the speed of life, even when faced with a multitude of tasks and limited time.
2. Experience faster information retrieval with “Circle to Search” on the Galaxy S24
The pioneering phone to introduce this intuitive, gesture-driven feature. With a simple circle gesture, explore new dimensions of discovery. No more frantic searching—when something catches your eye, circle it, and ta-da access Google Search results instantly. Get answers in a flash without leaving your feed, making information retrieval swift and seamless.
3. Elevate your photography with the “Generative Edit” feature on the Galaxy S24. After capturing a photo, harness the power of Generative Edit to effortlessly turn ordinary images into photographic masterpieces with just a few taps. This innovative Galaxy AI editing tool enables easy adjustments like erasing, recomposing, and remastering. Capture a great shot, then enhance it with Generative Edit to take your photos to the next level.
4. Find the right words fast with “Chat Assist” on the Galaxy S24.
Receive real-time tone suggestions to enhance the professionalism or conversational flow of your writing. With AI integrated into the Samsung Keyboard, effortlessly translate and communicate with friends and family in various languages—real-time translation is available in 13 languages. Carry on your conversations confidently, seamlessly bridging language barriers with ease on the Galaxy S24.
5. Overcome language barriers during calls with “Live Translate” on the Galaxy S24.
Whether making reservations while traveling abroad, this feature in your Phone app provides near-real-time voice translations. Enjoy two-way, real-time voice and text translations during phone calls, eliminating awkward lost-in-translation moments and enhancing communication on your Galaxy S24.
6. Note smarter, not harder, with “Note Assist” on the Samsung Galaxy S24.
Revolutionize your note-taking and organization in Samsung Notes with AI-generated summaries, streamlined templates, and cover creation for easy preview and retrieval. Additionally, Note Assist goes the extra mile by offering translation capabilities for your notes. Let the Galaxy S24’s Note Assist handle the heavy lifting of everyday tasks, making your note-taking experience more efficient and convenient.
7. Effortlessly transfer data and settings with “Smart Switch” to seamlessly set up your new Galaxy S24.
Once you’ve acquired your Samsung Galaxy S24, the setup process becomes a breeze. Smart Switch ensures that all your content from your previous phone, including photos, contacts, calendar events, notes, apps, themes, device settings, and more, stays with you during the transition to the Galaxy S24.
Apple Watch Series 9 Vs. Ultra 2
How To Turn on Find My Device on Android Phones
Google’s Update to “Quick Share” Improves Usability
How To Make Your Battery Last Longer On Your Gadget
Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 vs. Galaxy Watch 6 Classic: A Timeless Face-off!
How To Unlock Your Smartphone If You Forget the PIN
How To5 months ago
How To Make Your Battery Last Longer On Your Gadget
Reviews6 months ago
Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 vs. Galaxy Watch 6 Classic: A Timeless Face-off!
How To4 months ago
How To Unlock Your Smartphone If You Forget the PIN
Tech News7 months ago
Gurman: Apple Watch Redesigned ‘Apple Watch X’
Best Smart Home Gadgets5 months ago
How To Set Up a Smart Home: A Comprehensive Guide
How To4 months ago
How to Troubleshoot Common Gadget Problems
How To3 months ago
How To Use Voice Commands for Hands-Free Control.
Apps7 months ago
Photo Magic: How To Use Quick Crop on iPhone Photos App iOS 17